<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ADA Sitrep &#187; X-Band Radar</title>
	<atom:link href="http://adasitrep.com/category/new-systems/x-band-radar/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://adasitrep.com</link>
	<description>Blogging about Air &#38; Missile Defense.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 17:13:20 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why It is Incorrect to Say that the European Missile Defense Shield was Scrapped</title>
		<link>http://adasitrep.com/2009/09/18/why-it-is-incorrect-to-say-that-the-european-missile-defense-shield-was-scrapped/</link>
		<comments>http://adasitrep.com/2009/09/18/why-it-is-incorrect-to-say-that-the-european-missile-defense-shield-was-scrapped/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 00:44:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oozlefinch6</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SM-3 Missile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Band Radar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[missile defense]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adasitrep.com/?p=143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As more information comes out on the developments in regards to the US missile defense shield in Europe it is becoming quite clear that despite the claims of critics, missile defense in Europe is not being scrapped: House Republican leader Rep. John Boehner of Ohio agreed. “It shows a willful determination to continue ignoring the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As more information comes out on the developments in regards to the US missile defense shield in Europe it is becoming quite clear that despite the claims of critics, missile defense in Europe is not being scrapped:</p>
<blockquote><p><a href="http://www.armytimes.com/xml/news/2009/09/military_missiledefense_obama_091709w/091709ap_missiledefensepressconf_800.JPG"><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.armytimes.com/xml/news/2009/09/military_missiledefense_obama_091709w/091709ap_missiledefensepressconf_800.JPG" alt="" width="329" height="256" /></a></p>
<p>House Republican leader Rep. John Boehner of Ohio agreed. “It shows a willful determination to continue ignoring the threat posed by some of the most dangerous regimes in the world, while taking one of the most important defenses against Iran off the table.”</p>
<p>Anticipating that reaction, Gates said that “those who say we are scrapping missile defense in Europe are either misinformed or misrepresenting the reality of what we are doing. &#8230; I believe this new approach provides a better missile defense capability for our forces in Europe, for our European allies and eventually for our homeland than the program I recommended almost three years ago. It is more adapted to the threat we see developing and takes advantage of new technical capabilities available to us today.”  [<a href="http://www.armytimes.com/news/2009/09/military_missiledefense_obama_091709w/">Army Times</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>Here is why the reaction of critics is not justified:</p>
<blockquote><p>Raytheon’s land-based SM-3 program is the biggest winner from the administration’s decision to change its approach to defending allies against Iranian missiles.</p>
<p>Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Gen. James Cartwright, vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff and former head of Strategic Command, both cited the system as a key part in why the administration changed its mind during their Thursday morning briefing.</p>
<p>Of course, Gates and Cartwright also made very clear that Iran had played a mighty significant part in changing the American approach. The 2006 intelligence assessment that Iran would fairly soon deploy intercontinental ballistic missiles has been superseded. Today, Cartwright said, the real threat does not come from four or five rogue state ICBMs but from literally hundreds of short- and medium-range missiles capable of striking Israel, Europe and US forces in the region. Hoss Cartwright noted that the Shahab 3 is “developing more rapidly than expected.”</p>
<p>The march of missile defense in Europe will now look like this. In 2011, Patriots will be deployed, and a regular force of two or three SM-3-bearing ships will patrol the North Sea and the Mediterranean, Cartwright said. The next phase, beginning in 2015, will lead to the deployment of SM-3 1Bs, the next iteration of the missile, along with the first deployment of the land-based SM-3. In 2018 the country will send SM-3 2s ashore and at sea. Finally, in 2020, the U.S. will deploy SM-3 2Bs.</p>
<p>In addition to the threat, cost drove the decision calculus, Cartwright said, ticking off these facts: a PAC interceptor costs $3.3 million; a THAAD missile costs $9 million; an SM-3 goes for about $10 million, and upgraded SM-3 will cost $13 million to $15 million; the Ground Based Interceptor previously planned for Europe would have cost $70 million each.  [<a href="http://www.dodbuzz.com/2009/09/17/likely-winners-from-euro-missile-cut/">DOD Buzz</a>]</p></blockquote>
<p>To summarize what is going on here is that a proven system the SM-3 missile which is currently sea based on AEGIS platforms is going to be converted into a land based platform to replace the previously planned installation of ground based interceptors in Poland.  The development of land based SM-3 missiles has <a href="http://adasitrep.com/2009/05/05/is-the-us-going-to-give-the-sm-3-to-israel/">long been discussed for Israel</a> and now is becoming a reality for Europe and probably Israel as well.</p>
<p>Additionally the 360 degree X-band radar that was to be built in the Czech Republic will now no longer be built and instead replaced with a forward based X-band radar.  The 360 degree radar would have been very similar to the SBX radar currently stationed in the Pacific and the Russians were very concerned about this radar radiating over their territory.  The forward based X-band radar is a directional radar that is used for the THAAD missile system that also has <a href="http://adasitrep.com/2009/04/14/us-soldier-man-x-band-radar-in-israel-during-exercise/">two lone forward based radars</a> in Japan and Israel.  This radar is reportedly going to be based in the Caucaus region which most likely means in the nation of Georgia.  In addition to the X-band radar and SM-3 land based interceptors the missile shield will be further augmented with PATRIOT missile batteries and AEGIS SM-3 equipped ships based out of the Mediteranian and North Sea.</p>
<p>So basically the Pentagon is fielding a proven capability to protect Europe from the Iranian missile threat while at the same time eliminating Russian objections while dramatically cutting costs because AEGIS SM-3 missiles costs $60 million dollars less then the GBI&#8217;s.  This is in actuallity a great idea and one that people seriously concerned with national security should support.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adasitrep.com/2009/09/18/why-it-is-incorrect-to-say-that-the-european-missile-defense-shield-was-scrapped/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>US Soldier Man X-Band Radar In Israel During Exercise</title>
		<link>http://adasitrep.com/2009/04/14/us-soldier-man-x-band-radar-in-israel-during-exercise/</link>
		<comments>http://adasitrep.com/2009/04/14/us-soldier-man-x-band-radar-in-israel-during-exercise/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Apr 2009 13:01:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oozlefinch6</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Israel]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[X-Band Radar]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://adasitrep.com/?p=47</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[US air defense troops are around the world conducting a variety of missions to include even manning an X-band radar in Israel: U.S. troops took part in a missile defense exercise in Israel last week that for the first time incorporated a U.S.-owned radar system deployed to the country in October. About 100 Europe-based troops [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>US air defense troops are around the world conducting a variety of missions to include even manning an X-band radar in Israel:</p>
<blockquote>
<div class="article">
<p><a href="http://www.foxnews.com/images/463381/0_61_111008_xband.jpg"><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.foxnews.com/images/463381/0_61_111008_xband.jpg" alt="" width="320" height="240" /></a></p>
<p>U.S. troops took part in a missile defense exercise in Israel last week that  for the first time incorporated a U.S.-owned radar system deployed to the  country in October.</p>
<p>About 100 Europe-based troops continue to operate the X-Band radar, which is  intended to give Israel early warning in the event of a missile launch from  Iran.</p>
<p>While it’s not a permanent assignment for U.S. troops, as long as the radar  is in use, U.S. personnel will be there to operate it, U.S. European Command  said.</p>
<p>&#8220;The actual length of time has not been determined,&#8221; EUCOM said in a  statement. &#8220;The U.S. and Israel will continue to monitor the security  environment in the region and will base any decisions on radar deployment on a  thorough analysis of Israel’s missile defense requirements. We are focused on  the mission, not the calendar.&#8221;</p>
<p>Initially, 120 EUCOM personnel were dispatched in September to set up the  Army/Navy Transportable Radar Surveillance system, which was made available at  the request of Israel’s government.</p>
<p>A mix of troops and Defense Department contractors manage the day-to-day  operation of the radar, which is situated at Nevatim air base in the Negev  Desert.</p>
<p>According to the military, the radar is purely defensive and useful against  medium- and long-range ballistic missile attacks.</p>
<p>Last Monday, Israel conducted a test of an upgraded version of the Arrow  anti-missile system that involved shooting down a rocket that simulated Iran’s  Shihab missile. The rocket was shot down off Israel’s coastline. This was the  first Israeli test to include the U.S. radar.</p>
<p>&#8220;The radar is considered to be one of the most powerful defensive systems  available and its performance and the performance of everyone on the U.S. and  Israel team are doing exceptionally well in promoting regional security and  providing a useful deterrent to any attack,&#8221; EUCOM stated.</p>
<p>The system is reportedly capable of tracking a baseball-size object from a  distance of 2,900 miles.</p>
<p>It is expected to enable Israel to more rapidly activate its missile-defense  system in the event of an attack.  [<a href="http://www.stripes.com/article.asp?section=104&amp;article=61999">Stars &amp; Stripes</a>]</div>
<p><!-- ***************************************************************** Section/Region Recent Articles Block ************************************************************ --></p></blockquote>
<p>This radar was first <a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,449704,00.html">sent to Israel last year</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://adasitrep.com/2009/04/14/us-soldier-man-x-band-radar-in-israel-during-exercise/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

