The US Missile Defense Agency (MDA) awarded indefinite-delivery/ indefinite-quantity contracts to 3 small business qualifiers to provide advisory and assistance services to MDA’s Quality, Safety and Mission Assurance Directorate. Each contract has an ordering ceiling of $209.6 million.
The contractors will assist the directorate in assessing the engineering, technology, production and programmatic practices/ processes used to develop and operate the Ballistic Missile Defense (BMD) system. MDA is developing a layered BDM system that is designed to destroy enemy missiles by engaging them in all phases of flight (see graphic).
The MDA has come under criticism for the slow pace of BMD development, cost overruns, questionable auditing practices, and repeated test failures. The 3 contracts are part of an effort by MDA to streamline is contracting processes. The winners of the contracts are:
a.i. solutions’ Launch Services Division in Lanham, Md. (HQ0147-10-D-0027);
A-P-T Research in Huntsville, AL (HQ0147-10-D-0028); and
It is interesting how putting the screws to these defense contractors they can finally produce some results with this system:
A flying Boeing 747 jumbo jet equipped with a massive laser gun shot down a Scud-like missile over the Pacific late Thursday night, marking what analysts said was a major milestone in the development of the nation’s missile defense system.
The test shoot-down at 8:44 p.m. PST over a military test range near Point Mugu is expected to renew debate over spending billions of dollars for a system that seemed so far behind schedule that the Pentagon decided to significantly curtail its budget last year. The test, which the Pentagon described as a success, could be a major boon to Southern California, where much of the high-tech system has been developed and tested.
“Proving this technology is game-changing,” said Loren Thompson, a military policy analyst for the Lexington Institute, a think tank in Arlington, Va. “The program’s funding has been hanging on by a thread. A successful shoot-down of a ballistic missile will demonstrate to Capitol Hill that the airborne laser has potential.”
The airborne laser is designed to defend against ballistic missiles by shooting them down while they are in the boost stage, or when they are lifting off.
During the experiment, a 747-400F took off from Edwards Air Force Base in the Mojave Desert. The laser, which was affixed to the 747 and powered by chemicals loaded into the aircraft, shot a super-heated, basketball-size beam that traveled 670 million mph to incinerate a missile that was moving 4,000 mph, the Pentagon said.
It took just a few seconds for the beam to create a stress fracture in the missile, triggering it to split into pieces.
“The revolutionary use of directed energy is very attractive for missile defense, with the potential to attack multiple targets at the speed of light, at a range of hundreds of kilometers, and at a low cost per intercept attempt compared to current technologies,” the U.S. Missile Defense Agency said in a statement Friday. [Stars & Stripes]
The RBS-70 is actually a pretty good man portable missile, but requires a lot more training to become proficient with it because it is laser guided instead of the more common heat seeking variety of man portable missiles such as the Stinger:
The domain of man-portable air defense missile systems (MANPADS) has 4 major competitors around the world. Saab’s RBS-70 is used by 18 countries, and Finland continues to raise its order. Sweden’s Nordic next-door neighbor uses the RBS-70 in 2 modes: as a dispersed, soldier-carried system, and as a vehicle-mounted VSHORAD system.
A 2009 purchase will complement these dispersed, short-range RBS-70 systems with a wider air defense net based on Sentinel radars, and ground-launched AMRAAM missiles. This combination is intended to make Finland’s airspace dangerous enough to deny enemies full air dominance, while its difficult terrain and mobile land forces bleed any future invasion until it quits. If that strategy sounds improbable, recall that Finland forced Stalin’s Russia to settle for a qualified draw in the 1939 Winter War, when Hitler’s ally attacked Finland per the terms of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact. [Defense Industry Daily]
Could this announcement be in response to the Obama administration’s new approach towards missile defense?:
A contract on the delivery of advanced S-300 air defense systems to Iran has been stagnated by technical reasons, the Iranian ambassador to Russia said on Thursday, according to RIA Novosti.
Russia signed a contract with Iran on the supply of at least five S-300 air defense systems to Tehran in December 2005. However, there have been no official reports on the start of the contract’s implementation.
“Iran is ready to receive these systems and our Russian colleagues have assured us that they will meet their obligations,” Seyyed Mahmoud-Reza Sajjadi said at a news conference at RIA Novosti in Moscow.
“Several technical issues [in the contract's implementation] have emerged, and we hope they will be resolved soon,” the diplomat said without specifying the problems.
Many experts believe Moscow has refused so far to honor the S-300 contract due to pressure from Washington and Tel Aviv. [Defence Pros]
The Russian S-300 missile also known by the NATO designation of a SA-10 has a range of 150 kilometers and can destroy an aircraft at a maximum altitude of 30 kilometers. It also has the ability to shoot down not only aircraft but ballistic missiles as well. Its radar has the ability to simultaneously track 100 targets while being engage 12 of them at the same time. The radars maximum range is that it can detect ballistic missiles out to 1000 kilometers and cruise missiles and aircraft up to 300 kilometers.
The Missile Defense Agency is struggling with lousy quality control among its contractors, its executive director said during today’s budget briefing.
David Altwegg, a highly respected missileer and engineer, told reporters that he and his colleagues stood watching a recent THAAD test. A drogue parachute pulled the target out of a C-17. “We all stood there and watched it fall into the water,” said an obviously disgusted Altweg. A failure review board was convened and found the test failed due to “a quality control problem.”
But THAAD was not the only program with a quality problem, Altweg said. “Across the enterprise quality is a concern,” he said. The companies working for MDA suffer from “a lack of attention to detail. Missilery is all about detail,” he said with controlled passion. Altweg would not identify any particular companies but made clear there were very few that do no have quality problems.
“We are working this problem assiduously,” he said, saying that MDA send experts to companies to help them improve, “but we continue to have quality problems.” [DOD Buzz]
Keep in mind this is not the first time THAAD has been set back because of a target failure. Flight Test 10 back in 2008 experienced a target failure as well.
Romania’s top defense body approved an American proposal to base missile interceptors there, the country’s president said Thursday in a hastily arranged announcement.
The president, Traian Basescu, said in a statement that Romania, a former Warsaw Pact member and now part of NATO, was prepared to negotiate with the United States to accept ground-based interceptors as part of an antiballistic missile defense system. He said it could be working by 2015.
While the participation of Poland and the Czech Republic in the missile shield had been well known, the possibility that Romania would join them was not.
Romania made its announcement as Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates was in Turkey for a NATO meeting. He was not immediately available to comment but the White House spokesman, Robert Gibbs, said the announcement was welcomed. “We’re pleased that Romania has agreed to participate in that defense shield,” he told reporters in Washington. [NY Times]
The more I see Defense Secretary Robert Gates execute his duties it appears to me that publicly he always seems to side with President Obama and then it seems like he later privately gets the President to do the right thing and this case it is to increasing funding for missile defense:
Riki Ellison, Chairman and Founder of the Missile Defense Advocacy Alliance (MDAA), www.missiledefenseadvocacy.org has reviewed the FY2011 Missile Defense Budget released on February 1st by the Department of Defense which offers a substantial increase to the total budget for missile defense. This increase recovers close to half the amount that was cut by the President and Secretary Robert Gates a year ago. Ellison is one of the top lay experts in the world on the topic of missile defense. His comments and observations include the following:
“Early this week, President Barack Obama’s administration and the Department of Defense announced a substantial increase to the 2011 Missile Defense Budget. The amount, $9.42 billion, equals a 6.13 percent increase from the 2010 budget. This increase, $577 million, recovers close to half the amount that was cut by the President and Secretary Robert Gates a year ago. ” [Defence Pros]
People that follow missile defense probably all remember that just back in April the widely publicized cuts in missile defense were announced. However, the budget was cut, but I did like Secretary Gates strategy of focusing funding on missile defense systems that currently work.
With this new announcement the focusing of money on missile defense that currently works is only continuing:
Among the highlights of the 2011 Missile Defense Budget Request are:
• Increase of development funding of $359 million for the Ground Based Interceptors.
- Plans to construct 38 GBI silos and to buy 56 GBIs.
- A significant reversal from the 30 silos and 44 GBIs from last years request.
• Increase of 249 THAAD (142) and AEGIS SM3 (107) land and sea-based regional missile defense interceptors for a total of 867 by 2015.
• Upgrades of 3 additional Aegis Ballistic Missile Defense Ships.
• Addition of three new Missile Defense programs:
- $256 million for the Land-Based SM3 program that will go to over a $1.0 Billion by 2015.
- $99 million to Directed Energy Programs.
- $67 million for a future space based satellite sensor constellation called Precision Tracking Space System (PTSS) that will go to $1.2 Billion by 2015.
• Increase to $1.47 billion (up $31 million) for the AEGIS program.
• Increase to $1.0 billion (up $52 million) for the Patriot Terminal Defense interceptors and systems.
• Increase to $1.11 billion (up $290 million) for missile defense testing and targets.
• Increase to $319 million (up $63 million) for co-development with Japan on the Sea Based SM3-BlockIIa interceptor.
The increased funding into GMD is significant which is interesting considering the failure of the last fight test due to an issue with the SBX sensor. However, the technology and capability of the GMD program is impressive for those familiar with it and I believe with more testing this can become a more reliable program. Apparently the President now thinks so as well.
THAAD live fire at the Pacific Missile Range Facility In Hawaii.
What I am most excited about is to see more money being put into the THAAD and AEGIS SM-3 programs. These are both very successful systems. Also it was good to see money being poured into the land-based SM-3 program that will allow the missile to deployed in areas that an AEGIS ship cannot access. Finally considering the failure of the last THAAD flight test due to a target issue it is good to see that more money is being poured into testing and targets.
All in all I continue to believe a solid missile defense strategy is in place by Secretary Gates and President Obama.
Considering the various issues that continue to plague the GMD program that fact the SBX is acting up now is not a good thing:
The Missile Defense Agency conducted a flight test today of the Ground-Based Midcourse Defense System.
A target missile was successfully launched at approximately 3:40 p.m. PST from the U.S. Army’s Reagan Test Site at Kwajalein Atoll in the Republic of the Marshall Islands. Approximately six minutes later, a Ground-Based Interceptor was successfully launched from Vandenberg Air Force Base, Calif. Both the target missile and Ground-Based Interceptor performed nominally after launch. However, the Sea-Based X-band radar did not perform as expected.
Program officials will conduct an extensive investigation to determine the cause of the failure to intercept. [MDA Website]
The GMD system has a very spotty record and this latest flight test failure I am sure is probably not going over to well at the Pentagon. However, the thing people need to keep in mind is that this system is extremely complex and what it is doing is not easy and thus needs testing and with testing you have trial and error.
I quiet build up of missile defense capabilities is supposedly happening in the Middle East right now:
The United States has begun beefing up its approach to defending its Persian Gulf allies against potential Iranian missile strikes, officials say. The defenses are being stepped up in advance of possible increased sanctions against Iran.
The Obama administration has quietly increased the capability of land-based Patriot defensive missiles in several Gulf Arab nations, and one military official said the Navy is increasing the presence of ships capable of knocking out hostile missiles in flight.
The officials discussed aspects of the defensive strategy Saturday on condition of anonymity because some elements are classified.
The moves, part of a broader adjustment in the U.S. approach to missile defense, including in Europe and Asia have been in the works for months. Details have not been publicly announced, in part because of diplomatic sensitivities in Gulf countries which worry about Iranian military capabilities but are cautious about acknowledging U.S. protection.
The White House will send a review of ballistic missile strategy to Congress on Monday that frames the larger shifts. Attention to defense of the Persian Gulf region, a focus on diffuse networks of sensors and weapons and cooperation with Russia are major elements of the study, according to documents obtained by The Associated Press.
Russia opposed Bush administration plans for a land-based missile defense site in Eastern Europe, and President Barack Obama’s decision to walk away from that plan last year was partly in pursuit of new capabilities that might hold greater promise and partly in deference to Russia.
One military official said the adjustments in the Gulf should be seen as prudent defensive measures designed to deter Iran from taking aggressive action in the region, more than as a signal that Washington expects Iran to retaliate for any additional sanctions.
Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton consulted with numerous allies during a visit to London this week. She told reporters that the evident failure of U.S. offers to engage Iran in negotiations over its nuclear program means the U.S. will now press for additional sanctions against the Iranian government.
Gen. David Petraeus, the U.S. Central Command chief who is responsible for U.S. military operations across the Middle East, mentioned in several recent public speeches one element of the defensive strategy in the Gulf: upgrading Patriot missile systems, which originally were deployed in the region to shoot down aircraft but now can hit missiles in flight.
In remarks at Georgetown Law School on Jan. 21, Petraeus said the U.S. now has eight Patriot missile batteries stationed in the Gulf region — two each in four countries. He did not name the countries, but Kuwait has long been known to have Patriots on its territory.
A military official said Saturday that the three other countries are the United Arab Emirates, Bahrain — which also hosts the U.S. Navy’s 5th Fleet headquarters — and Qatar, home to a modernized U.S. air operations center that has played a key role in the Iraq and Afghanistan wars. [Associated Press]
Even though the Iranians probably know exactly where our PATRIOT batteries are in these four countries, it still concerns me that we have people in the US military leaking classified information to the media.
